- Details
- Written by Olga Šestakova
- Parent Category: English
- Category: English 16-19
- Created: 19 November 2013
In this entry I’ll describe two lessons I conducted in form 10 about modal verbs.
1. Lesson / task description - before
- Aim (what I want them to learn)
- In terms of subject matter: Ss are aware of different forms of infinitive and see how they function to express different time of the action
- In terms of thinking: Ss can classify given modal verbs constructions using the parameter “time of the action”
- Materials I am going to use: Walker, E., Grammar Practice for Upper Intermediate Students with key. Longman: Pearson Education Limited. – 2000. P.99-100
- Tasks I am going to use: Walker, E., Grammar Practice for Upper Intermediate Students with key. Longman: Pearson Education Limited. – 2000. P.99-100
2. Lesson / task description – after
First, Ss were given a worksheet where they were asked to insert the appropriate modal verb and the infinitive form. When Ss did the task, I showed them the answers. Ss corrected their variants. The average score was about 3-4 correct answers out of 10.
When they were ready I asked them to formulate at least 2 questions the answers to which they would like to find by the end of our work with these modal verbs.
When Ss finished, I drew their attention to different infinitive forms that exist. We discussed the form of each infinitive.
After that the Ss were given a number of sentences. Ss were asked to read the sentences and to write next to each sentence what they think the time of the action is. When they finished, we compiled a table:
Modal Verb |
TIME OF THE ACTION |
CAN |
|
COULD+INF |
?PAST/FUTURE/NOW |
MAY+INF |
FUTURE/NOW |
MIGHT+INF |
FUTURE |
MUST |
|
WILL+INF |
NOW |
SHOULD |
|
OUGHT TO |
|
WILL+BE+VING |
FUTURE? |
MAY+BE+VING |
NOW |
MIGHT+BE+VING |
NOW |
MAY+HAVE+V3 |
PAST |
COULD+HAVE+V3 |
PAST |
MIGHT+HAVE+BEEN+ VING |
PAST |
We discussed each answer with Ss. I didn’t correct them or give any hints. But there where ideas differed, we put a question mark.
Ss home task was to finish filling in the grid (parameter “time of the action”)
3. Overall reflection on the lesson / task
- Aim aspect (to what extent did we reach the aims?) I think that the aim was achieved. Although I believe that the aim should be extended from just “seeing” to “applying” or “transforming”.
- Tasks & materials aspect (how did we work on the tasks to reach the aim? Please make specific references to the steps of the thinking task framework)
We analysed the examples from the course book and compiled a table.
- Questions / conclusions for the future
1 What should I change in my lesson structure to make it more “thinking”?
2 How to work with “wrong” places in the Ss’s models? Should I select such sentences where the “right” answer would be obvious?
Lesson 2
1. Lesson / task description - before
- Aim (what I want them to learn)
- In terms of subject matter: Ss are aware of different modal verbs and see when they are used to express the particular degree of speaker’s certainty.
- In terms of thinking: Ss can classify given modal verbs constructions using the parameters “degree of probability” and “basis for assumption” using the given examples.
- Materials I am going to use: Walker, E., Grammar Practice for Upper Intermediate Students with key. Longman: Pearson Education Limited. – 2000. P.99-100
- Tasks I am going to use: Walker, E., Grammar Practice for Upper Intermediate Students with key. Longman: Pearson Education Limited. – 2000. P.99-100
2. Lesson / task description – after
In the beginning of the second lesson I asked Ss whether they have any questions about their home task. Several questions about the time of the action were asked. We discussed each answer with Ss. I didn’t correct them or give any hints. But there where ideas differed we put a question mark.
Then I gave to Ss the following sentences:
It must be Peter.
It should be Peter.
It may be Peter.
It might be Peter.
Ss were asked to try to formulate another parameter to compare the modal verbs. Different answers were given (“how sure is the speaker”, “personal ideas”, etc.) Finally, we formulated it as “degree of probability”. Ss were asked to read the sentences and to write next to each sentence what they think the degree of probability is. When they finished, we compiled a table:
Modal Verb |
TIME OF THE ACTION |
Degree of probability |
CAN |
|
c |
COULD+INF |
?PAST/FUTURE/NOW |
Low/medium |
MAY+INF |
FUTURE/NOW |
medium |
MIGHT+INF |
FUTURE |
Medium?/low |
MUST |
|
|
WILL+INF |
NOW |
Almost fact |
SHOULD |
|
|
OUGHT TO |
|
|
WILL+BE+VING |
FUTURE? |
Almost fact |
MAY+BE+VING |
NOW |
Medium/low |
MIGHT+BE+VING |
NOW |
Medium/high? |
MAY+HAVE+V3 |
PAST |
Medium/high? |
COULD+HAVE+V3 |
PAST |
Medium/low |
MIGHT+HAVE+BEEN+ VING |
PAST |
|
We discussed each answer with Ss. I didn’t correct them or give any hints. But there where ideas differed we put a question mark. It turned out that degree of probability depends on the “basis for assumption” or what influences the speaker’s degree of certainty. Thus, the 3rd parameter was added and discussed “basis for assumption”.
Modal Verb |
Degree of probability |
Basis for assumption |
CAN |
c |
|
COULD+INF |
Low/medium |
Personal choice/ opinion |
MAY+INF |
medium |
assumption |
MIGHT+INF |
Medium?/low |
Personal opinion |
MUST |
|
|
WILL+INF |
Almost fact |
Background knowledge |
SHOULD |
|
|
OUGHT TO |
|
|
WILL+BE+VING |
Almost fact |
Background knowledge |
MAY+BE+VING |
Medium/low |
Personal opinion |
MIGHT+BE+VING |
Medium/high? |
Personal opinion |
MAY+HAVE+V3 |
Medium/high? |
Personal opinion Background knowledge |
COULD+HAVE+V3 |
Medium/low |
Personal opinion
|
Ss home task was to finish filling in the grid (parameters “degree of probability” and “basis for assumption”)
Next lesson I plan to give Ss sentences where they will have to insert the modal verbs and the appropriate infinitive form. But before that they’ll have to fill in the value of each parameter: time of the action, degree of probability and basis for necessity.
3. Overall reflection on the lesson / task
- Aim aspect (to what extent did we reach the aims?) I think that the aim was achieved. Although I believe that the aim should be extended from just “seeing” to “applying” or “transforming”.
- Tasks & materials aspect
We analysed the examples from the course book and compiled a table.
- Questions / conclusions for the future
1 What are the possible follow-ups?
2 How to organize Ss’s re-drafting of their models?
Comments
>1. What should I change in my lesson structure to make it more “thinking”?
If we look at it from the Thinking Task Framework perspective (a tool for structuring a lesson in a thinking way), I think the following improvements are possible:
Step 1 - more attention could have been given to contextualising and actually defining the problems to deal with. You gave them a test and demonstrated to them that they had problems with the topic. It's not clear, at least from your reflection, if they had an opportunity to define learning goals based on their difficulties.
Step 2 - here I think you should have given them less guidance. It seems that you defined a parameter for them (Time of Action was part of your instruction, it's not really clear how Degree of Probability appeared out of your discussion with students). A possible alternative would have been to think of a supplementary task where students arrive at possible parameters to pay attention to. And only then move to actual course book like tasks.
Step 3 - this step always goes hand in hand with the previous one. It's difficult for me to judge what actually happened during the lesson as information is scarce. One possible thing is to get students to realise that their models don't really work or are not applied appropriately.
>2 How to work with “wrong” places in the Ss’s models? Should I select
> such sentences where the “right” answer would be obvious?
I am not sure I understand the question. If you look at the description of the Creative Grammar Technology (http://www.thinking-approach.org/index.php?menu=1&id=10), you will see that students are expected to collect a bank of mistakes when doing tasks in Part 5. Perhaps you could share specific questions you have regarding this process and then I will try to respond.
In fact your two questions after the second lesson are connected with this one. Please look at the link above. You can also take a look at www.thinking-approach.eu - in fact, if you try to do one of the grammar systems there yourself, you will have a very good idea about how the process is organised. But as I wrote, feel free to share specific questions.